The success of community-based organisations to respond and deliver to societal needs is becoming increasingly important through times of greater need for more humanistic responses to our challenges. Community-based organisations, public sector organisations, local authorities, non-profit organisations, and many other individuals and organisations have been heroic during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. We here at Kingfisher Commons are doing academic research to explore the success of the community sector from the perspective of being responsive to community wants and needs, demonstrating impact, and evaluating the services they offer. Essentially do organisations have the research skills in-house to be able to carry out these activities?
Why is it necessary to have research skills?
The ability to systematically collect data is becoming increasingly needed in a world of greater reliance on the community sector to respond to societal challenges. Knowing and understanding the needs and wants of communities are at the heart of this. Funders and supporters of non-profits are requiring greater evidence of the capabilities of organisations to be more responsive and people-led. Furthermore, the types of research data required to log impact and evaluate projects can be highly complex and time-consuming for non-profits wanting to focus on the delivery of supporting those in need. Therefore, making it crucial for organisations to have research skills.
Important yet elusive
Research skills are a neglected consideration when considering the success factors of non-profit organisations. The lack of understanding of the research needs of non-profits is having significant consequences on the success and sustainability of organisations. Not only is this focus overlooked in practice, by funders and public sector organisations, but it is also often an underexplored area by researchers and academics.
Of course, there are pools of literature on community needs assessments, asset mapping, participatory engagement practices, etc. But where this lack of understanding is apparent is how non-profit organisations are, on an ongoing basis, using tools to collect, manage, analyse and use research data (including feedback, beneficiary data, and local statistical information), to progress and sustain their organisations. Given there is a drive from funders to be people-led, co-produce projects, and utilise evidence to inform decision-making, there appears to be a lack of support in the sector being able to or confident enough to make this leap.
In many functions of non-profit work, research is not overlooked. Community organisations often participate in challenging policy creation and implementation processes and therefore need to learn about the research methodology involved in the creation of social policies (Fox, 2001; Appleton, 2003). It is found that the process of monitoring and evaluating, and the management of data, has commonly been explored from the context of research skills within the literature on non-profits (Mancini, Marek, Byrne, & Huebner, 2004).
Indeed, the increasing focus on Social Return on Investment, social investment models, and social prescribing is requiring greater efficiency in collating data on impact and evaluation. We witness organisations being at the mercy of funders that determine the way in which schemes are evaluated, which often does not reflect the way beneficiaries are able to effectively utilise these tools, leading to unreliable and invalid data. Requirements to focus on outcomes and impact as opposed to outputs lead to a real challenge for the sector to record and log information in a valid and reliable way, particularly with little understanding of what contributes to validity and how to ethically carry out research.

Impact of Research on organisations
There is evidence within the literature on the success of participatory research in increasing community and general public involvement. The core features of such participatory approaches to research are found to be collaboration, mutual education, and implementing actions identified in the research. Community resources, knowledge, and expertise are extremely valuable and are considered as being key to the success of such projects (see Macaulay, Commanda, and Freeman et. al., 1999).
Indeed, from an internet search, there are a few community research toolkits that are lengthy and complex to unpick, but nonetheless, highlight that there is a need to change the way community organisations perceive the research process. For a non-profit supporter (perhaps trustee, director, member of staff, or volunteer) it is tricky to consider how to add additional practices to their already sometimes overwhelming experiences of responding and acting upon their community needs.
What skills do organisations really need?
Our investigation into the literature, and from the experience of working with and advising community organisations, demonstrates a focus on processes rather than the ways data is collected and analysed by these organisations and how these methodologies can affect the success of nonprofits. This leads us to question what research skills do non-profits have and/or need to be most successful?
Further questions also are raised:
- What data do non-profits collect and how do they collect it?
- How do they use that data? i.e. does it inform change in their organisation? Do they use it to challenge/lobby?
- What challenges do they face in collecting data?
- What challenges do they face in using research data?
Our specific focus is on how their research skills might influence the way in which they engage with their communities as well as log outcomes and impact.
Upon initial investigation, we are curious about the following where research skills might be important to organisations’ success:
- Business planning
- Collecting and analysing evidence of wants and needs
- Being people-led
- Beneficiary engagement
- Volunteer empowerment
- Monitoring and evaluating
- Impact logging
- Lobbying and campaigning
What do we aim to do with this?
With this research, we aim to
- Identify what research skills community organisations have and need
- Clarify in what situations research skills contribute to community organisations’ success
- Understand barriers that are in community organisations’ way to carrying out effective community engagement and monitoring and evaluation
- Identify how people in community organisations can be better supported
- Present to funders and umbrella organisations the findings to demonstrate the need to invest in community research
What will we be doing with this research?
By collecting all data and analysing it, we will create an insight report on England’s community organisations. Along with that, we will use this data to design our offerings well so we can serve you with the best service in the sector.
We are carrying out independent research on this by interviewing representatives from organisations that support the community sector (including locally based organisations as part of the NCVO, ACRE, and Community Foundations networks). We are also surveying community organisations during the month of July 2022.
Please support us in this research process by completing this survey. Your contribution is immensely valuable.
Thank you very much for your time. Please subscribe to our mailing list for more such blogs and remain updated about our offerings.
References
- Macaulay, A.C., Commanda, L.E., Freeman, W.L., Gibson, N., McCabe, M.L., Robbins, C.M., & Twohig, P.L., (1999) Participatory research maximizes community and lay involvement. British Medical Journal, 319, 774–778.
- Appleton, L. (2003). The contribution of NPOs to family policy formulation in EU member and applicant states. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 14, 79-103
- Fox, J. (2001). Vertically integrated policy monitoring: a tool for civil society policy advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 30, 616-627
- Jay A. Mancini PhD, Lydia I. Marek PhD, Richard A. W. Byrne MS & Angela J. Huebner PhD (2004) Community-Based Program Research, Journal of Community Practice, 12:1-2, 7-21